In focus. Has patient autonomy gone to far? Geneticists' views in 36 nations.

DC Wertz, JC Fletcher, I Nippert, G Wolff… - The American Journal …, 2002 - europepmc.org
DC Wertz, JC Fletcher, I Nippert, G Wolff, S Ayme
The American Journal of Bioethics: AJOB, 2002europepmc.org
We surveyed genetics professionals, patients, and the public about rights to information, to
requested services, and to parenthood, posing difficult cases found in practice. In all, 2906
genetics professionals (63%), 499 primary care physicians (59%), 476 North American
genetics patients (67%), 394 French patients (51%), 593 German patients (65%), and 988
members of the American public (99%) returned anonymous questionnaires. Results
suggest a trend toward increased respect for patient autonomy since an earlier survey in …
We surveyed genetics professionals, patients, and the public about rights to information, to requested services, and to parenthood, posing difficult cases found in practice. In all, 2906 genetics professionals (63%), 499 primary care physicians (59%), 476 North American genetics patients (67%), 394 French patients (51%), 593 German patients (65%), and 988 members of the American public (99%) returned anonymous questionnaires. Results suggest a trend toward increased respect for patient autonomy since an earlier survey in 1985; in most nations more would perform prenatal diagnosis for a couple with 4 daughters who desire a son. A minority (35% in US, 14% elsewhere) would perform PND for a deaf couple who want a deaf child, but most (94% in US, 62% elsewhere) would do prenatal paternity testing in the absence of rape or incest. About half (51%) would support a woman with fragile X who wants children. The trend to respect patient autonomy was greatest in the US and was least evident in China and India. In general, responses to these cases illustrate a shift away from population or eugenic concerns to a model of genetics focused on the individual.
europepmc.org
以上显示的是最相近的搜索结果。 查看全部搜索结果